Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vamsee Juluri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (withdrawn). Geschichte (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Vamsee Juluri

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Vamsee Juluri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. His book Saraswati's Intelligence may be notable ([1], [2]) but I don't think he is. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Withdraw. Per below, meets WP:NAUTHOR. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. No readily available evidence of WP:NACADEMIC or other notability criteria. I don't think their book would be notable either. Jmill1806 (talk) 00:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I believe this article shouldn't be deleted. He was an important participant in the California textbook controversy. He is also the author of notable books. I'd in fact like to see this article get expanded. Czar-peter-123 (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

• Keep. I added nine published reviews of five of his books to the article. I think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  David Eppstein, Thanks. Not sure how I missed those. I agree that's enough for NAUTHOR. Jmill1806, would you mind giving your !vote fresh consideration in light of these reviews? I see no reason to leave this open any longer, but am unable to withdraw unless you strike or amend your vote. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

AleatoryPonderings, yes, I withdraw my previous Delete vote. Thanks for finding those, David Eppstein. Jmill1806 (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.