Jump to content

Talk:The Head Hunter (2018 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]

This is more of a reminder for me to add these sources for the film later on:

--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More sources to add:

--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Head Hunter (2018 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Paleface Jack (talk · contribs) 19:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I have gone through the page and made a series of copyedits. I can find no grammatical, layout, or word choice problems.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    I will conduct a spot check of every fifth source. Source [3] does cover the $30,000 budget, the quote by Jordan Downey, Downey and Kevin Stewart writing the script, Christopher Rygh's feature film debut, and overall production details. [4] covers the box office. [8] covers him making ThanksKilling. [13] covers Rygh starring in Ulfberht. I was initially doubtful about source [18] being from Soundtrack.Net, but I found that it has a Wikipedia page and is reputable. [23] covers its showing at the Nightmares Film Festival. [28] covers its showing at PIFF After Dark. [33] covers Shudder acquiring the streaming rights and both dates listed in the sentence are within the article. [38] is the Rotten Tomatoes score. [43] is Polygon's review of the film and does list the budget as its major flaw, comparison to Skyrim, and the quotes are within it. [48] is the Collider source, but it is the top 15 rather than top 10, but they probably changed the article. You should really make sure to archive your sources because of this.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article covers the plot, development, production, filming, release, reviews, and awards.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I can see no neutrality problems.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Barely any edits for the past few months.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    There are five images in the page and all of them are either fair use or on commons.
  7. Overall: I will pass this after I archive the sources. Done. @Paleface Jack:
    Pass/Fail: