Talk:The Head Hunter (2018 film)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:The Head Hunter (2019 film))
![]() | The Head Hunter (2018 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 25, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Head Hunter (2018 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]This is more of a reminder for me to add these sources for the film later on:
- https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/screens/2019-04-10/tracking-down-grief-with-the-head-hunter/
- https://filmschoolrejects.com/the-head-hunter-movie-interview/
- https://horrornews.net/141643/interview-director-jordan-downey-the-head-hunter/
--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
More sources to add:
- https://www.starburstmagazine.com/reviews/head-hunter-2/
- https://lwlies.com/articles/the-head-hunter-jordan-downey-army-of-darkness/
- https://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2021/04/08/home-entertainment-the-head-hunter-blu-ray-review/
--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Head Hunter (2018 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Paleface Jack (talk · contribs) 19:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Paleface Jack: I will begin my review in due time. Jon698 (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Jon698 sounds good Paleface Jack (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- I will conduct a spot check of every fifth source. Source [3] does cover the $30,000 budget, the quote by Jordan Downey, Downey and Kevin Stewart writing the script, Christopher Rygh's feature film debut, and overall production details. [4] covers the box office. [8] covers him making ThanksKilling. [13] covers Rygh starring in Ulfberht. I was initially doubtful about source [18] being from Soundtrack.Net, but I found that it has a Wikipedia page and is reputable. [23] covers its showing at the Nightmares Film Festival. [28] covers its showing at PIFF After Dark. [33] covers Shudder acquiring the streaming rights and both dates listed in the sentence are within the article. [38] is the Rotten Tomatoes score. [43] is Polygon's review of the film and does list the budget as its major flaw, comparison to Skyrim, and the quotes are within it. [48] is the Collider source, but it is the top 15 rather than top 10, but they probably changed the article. You should really make sure to archive your sources because of this.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article covers the plot, development, production, filming, release, reviews, and awards.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I can see no neutrality problems.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Barely any edits for the past few months.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- There are five images in the page and all of them are either fair use or on commons.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall: I will pass this after I archive the sources. Done. @Paleface Jack:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/26 March 2020
- Accepted AfC submissions
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- GA-Class Portugal articles
- Low-importance Portugal articles
- WikiProject Portugal articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles